This ceramic manufacturing case study shows how material selection and engineering redesign helped solve a real production problem in a high-end outdoor furniture project.
Project Background (Key Facts)
| Item | Description |
|---|---|
| Application | High-end outdoor furniture component |
| Customer Focus | Durability, appearance, long-term reliability |
| Original Material | Steel + Aluminum |
| Main Issue | Surface scratching and damage during use |
| Target Improvement | Scratch resistance and premium surface finish |
Why Material Change Was Needed
-
Metal parts met structural requirements
-
Surface was easily scratched during real use
-
Appearance quality did not match premium positioning
Conclusion: Material performance and appearance were limiting factors.
Proposed Material Solution
| Material Option | Evaluation |
|---|---|
| Ceramic | High scratch resistance |
| Premium surface appearance | |
| Suitable for outdoor environments |
Decision: Switch to ceramic material.
Manufacturing Challenge Identified
During engineering review, a critical risk was found.
| Issue | Impact |
|---|---|
| Fully solid design | Binder could not escape |
| Debinding blockage | High risk of deformation |
| Internal stress | Cracking during sintering |
This is a common challenge in ceramic manufacturing, especially for solid structures.
Engineering Redesign Approach
Instead of forcing the process, the design was revised.
Key design changes:
-
Hollowed non-visible internal areas
-
Maintained all visible surfaces
-
Improved binder removal path
| Result | Effect |
|---|---|
| Better debinding | Reduced deformation risk |
| Lower internal stress | Stable sintering |
| Unchanged exterior | Preserved appearance |
Final Manufacturing Outcome
| Result Category | Outcome |
|---|---|
| Manufacturing Stability | Issue fully resolved |
| Appearance Quality | Clean and premium finish |
| Functional Performance | Reliable in real use |
| Customer Feedback | Strong positive response |
Why This Ceramic Manufacturing Case Study Matters
This ceramic manufacturing case study demonstrates that:
-
Material selection affects manufacturability
-
Design must consider the sintering process
-
Engineering support is critical in ceramic production
The key is not just making parts, but making them manufacturable.
Summary for Engineers
-
Ceramic material improved durability and appearance
-
Design optimization enabled stable sintering
-
Manufacturing feasibility was solved at the design stage
If you are working on a project where material choice, ceramic manufacturing feasibility, and surface quality all matter, this case study shows how engineering-driven decisions lead to better results.

Share:
Manufacturing Capability Built for Real Production Projects丨XY-GLOBAL Production Capacity